Dear Ms. Schreder:
Thank you for your letter dated April ??, 2013 which was in response to a letter I sent to you nearly an entire month after a letter I sent to you. Why you felt the need to point out the fact that I happened to neglect to date that letter that I sent, I find very curious. Please make your client clearly aware of the following facts:
1) I find that Sara’s refusal to allow Austin to have Skype-to-Skype brief visits with me, his father, utterly absurd and yet, totally consistent with her controlling, narcissistic, alienation tactics. Whatever “recent events” you might be referring to, there is NOTHING I have done that should prevent me from being able to electronically video conference with my son! — Rest assured, I WILL be motioning the court to address this!
2) Since Austin’s mother is doing her best to try and eliminate me from our son’s life, I am doing the best I can from long distance. The truth is, my disabilities caused by my heart transplant, are prohibiting me from moving back to Minnesota where I have no physical aid to help me in my day to day activities. As such, I have been highly motivated to let Austin Berg to know who is REAL Daddy is and who the “Berg” side of his family comes from. I have been making several videos and pictures that I want to share with him during our family get togethers, which, I intend to share with him. I have even recruited the help of Austin’s cousin, Zander (whom he has never met), to help me read through a Bible story book made for kids. My intent is to upload the videos to a special YouTube account that Austin should be able to view anytime he wants. — My request is that, Austin will have free access to that website, which he will be able to view on his own, pending his mother’s approval.
3) I have NOT abandoned my parental rights! Nor have there been issued any kind of restraining orders against me. Therefore, do not be surprised if I happen to show up for doctor’s appointments, parent-teacher conferences, or church events. I have already contacted Austin’s principal, letting her know that I am determined to become more involved in my son’s life, which I do and will.
4) I had already informed Sara that my Social Security Disability benefits were being reviewed. I found out in March 2013 that my request for continuation were being denied and +
In any event, I find Sara’s continued attempts at alienating Austin from his true father extremely disturbing. I know that Austin is forbidden for referring to me as his “dad” or “daddy” (he has only ONCE referred to me as such). Additionally, Sara has done NOTHING to PROACTIVELY ENCOURAGE Austin to have a good, and healthy relationship with his father. She has ONLY done the bare minimum that the court has required of her. – Even though Sara might continue to hold the false belief that I was unfaithful to her in our marriage, something that I actually believe about her and yet have been able to forgive her for, and, as such, since she claims to be an Evangelical Christian, I do not believe her marriage to Garrick Wexler is legitimate, either (legally but not biblically).
In any event, even though Sara had no biblical basis for divorcing me, we are now legally divorced.
In fact, the absolute opposite is true.
Even though Perspectives is no longer a program available for Austin and I to participate in since they no longer offer
(and, that is NOT only because I was terminated because of my troublesome disease of alcoholism that I’ve been suffering from)